Archive for October, 2010

10/26/2010 – Weekly Round-Up of New Green Trademarks

Here’s this week’s rundown on the green trademarks processed by the USPTO this week:

  • Green trade/service marks published for opposition: 154

Including the following:

Mark Image Mark ImageMark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image

  • Green certification/collective marks published for opposition: 1

Mark Image

  • Green trade/service marks awarded registration: 37

Including the following:

Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image

  • Green certification/collective marks awarded registration: 2

Mark Image Mark Image



The volume of green trademarks published for opposition was up slightly this week. The number of registrations issued on green marks was down fairly sharply over the prior week.





Leave a Comment

10/20/2010 – Weekly Round-Up of New Green Trademarks

Here’s this week’s rundown on the green trademarks processed by the USPTO this week:

  • Green trade/service marks published for opposition: 138

Including the following:

Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image

  • Green certification/collective marks published for opposition: None this week.
  • Green trade/service marks awarded registration: 61

Including the following:

Mark ImageMark Image Mark ImageMark Image Mark ImageMark Image Mark Image

  • Green certification/collective marks awarded registration: 1

Mark Image

The volume of green trademarks published for opposition was up slightly this week, although not in proportion to an increase in the overall volume of marks processed. The number of registrations issued on green marks was up substantially over the prior week.





Leave a Comment

10/13/2010 – Weekly Round-Up of New Green Trademarks

Here’s this week’s rundown on the green trademarks processed by the USPTO this week:

  • Green trade/service marks published for opposition: 130

Including the following:

Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image

  • Green certification/collective marks published for opposition: 1

Mark Image

  • Green trade/service marks awarded registration: 28

Including the following:

Mark Image Mark Image Mark Image

  • Green certification/collective marks awarded registration: None this week.

The volume of green trademarks, both published for opposition as well as those awarded registration, was down this week, although the volume of all marks processed was also relatively light.





Leave a Comment

FTC Proposes Revisions to the Green Guides

Yesterday, the Federal Trade Commission proposed revisions to the guidance that it gives marketers to help them avoid making misleading environmental claims, also known as “greenwashing”. The proposed changes, which were approved for public consideration by a 5-0 vote, are designed to update the FTC’s “Green Guides” and make them easier for companies to understand and use, as well as to strengthen the FTC’s guidance on those marketing claims that are already addressed in the current Guides and to provide new guidance on marketing claims that were not common when the Guides were last reviewed.



The proposed changes were developed using information collected from three public workshops, public comments, and a study of how consumers understand certain environmental claims. The FTC is seeking public comments on the proposed changes until December 10, 2010, after which it will decide which changes to make final.



The Green Guides were first issued in 1992 to help marketers ensure that the claims they are making are true and substantiated. The Guides were revised in 1996 and 1998. The guidance they provide includes: 1) general principles that apply to all environmental marketing claims; 2) how consumers are likely to interpret particular claims and how marketers can substantiate these claims; and 3) how marketers can qualify their claims to avoid deceiving consumers.



The revision process is part of the newly intensified effort on the part of the Federal government to crack down on greenwashing.  Here are some highlights of what is, and isn’t, in the new revisions:

  • Caution against any blanket eco-friendly, due to consumers’ tendency to assume that this means a product is greener than it really is
  • Caution against use of unqualified certifications or seals. Qualifications for green certifications should be clear, prominent, and specific.
  • New guidance concerning the use of terms like “renewable materials” and “renewable energy”
  • New guidance related to carbon offsets
  • Still no guidance on terms such as “sustainable” (whew!), “natural”, or “organic” (already regulated by the USDA)

The FTC is seeking comment on all aspects of its proposal. Examples include:

  • How should marketers qualify “made with renewable materials” claims, if at all, to avoid deception?
  • Should the FTC provide guidance concerning how long consumers think it will take a liquid substance to completely degrade?
  • How do consumers understand “carbon offset” and “carbon neutral” claims? Is there any evidence of consumer confusion concerning the use of these claims?

Click here to download a copy of the full report. Click here for an executive summary.


US-FederalTradeCommission-Seal.svg

Comments (1)

10/6/2010 – Weekly Round-Up of New Green Trademarks

Here’s this week’s rundown on the green trademarks processed by the USPTO this week:

  • Green trade/service marks published for opposition:179

Including the following:

Mark ImageMark ImageMark Image Mark Image Mark Image Mark ImageMark ImageMark Image Mark Image

  • Green certification/collective marks published for opposition:None this week.
  • Green trade/service marks awarded registration: 56

Including the following:

Mark ImageMark ImageMark ImageMark ImageMark Image

  • Green certification/collective marks awarded registration: None this week.

The volume of green trademarks, both published for opposition as well as awarded registration, was up substantially this week, even controlling for the overall higher volume (~15% more than normal) of all marks processed.





Leave a Comment